<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for David Perkins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dmperkins.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dmperkins.com</link>
	<description>www.dmperkins.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:06:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Echoes of Oklahoma City 1995 by Gwendol Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/03/echoes-of-oklahoma-city-1995/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwendol Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1855#comment-262</guid>
		<description>You know what? I really like tea (and coffee, and hot chocolate, and Bosco, and lemonade, and water, and alcoholic beverages [at LEAST some of them] and Kool-Aid, and milk, and if I left a beverage or drink out because I forgot or haven&#039;t tried it I am sorry). I like some partys. I like to have fun. I sure would appreciate if these people would quit using beverages for their uniequivocal vocal confusion of our stances in the United States. I REALLY LIKE TEA. When I give a tea party, I don&#039;t not wish for people to immediately think of this. I LIKE TEA.

IF in any way, the media, and this pseudomovement are indeed related to the events in Ausin, Texas -- THEN this group must look in the mirror as inciting (let&#039;s not confuse here) irreverent, dangerous behavior, forcing damage to our home soil, destruction of property, violation of numberous American values, and the taking of life in the name of being &quot;patriotic&quot; -- if being patriotic causes this kind of behavior -- sleep well and happy -- may the tax-man find you for sure. This sort of behavior is costing a bundle. Frankly, I did not see the full speech that Sarah Palin made in Texas, and many seemed to enjoy it from what I saw. However, she has a gob of nerve coming to Texas and invoking the &quot;S&quot; word. She perhaps would have done better for her state of Alaska in actually serving her state for some major portion of her term. They elected her; I didn&#039;t and she just plain let the voters of Alaska down.

Texas has enough to deal with on it&#039;s own without carpetbagging imports coming to incite more to deal with and pay for before taxes. Shame on the Texas people who support this sort of outside intrusion. Texans never mind laughing at themselves. We don&#039;t laugh at planes intentionally crashing anywhere in Texas. We DO have a degree of Howard Hughes in all of us by way of history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what? I really like tea (and coffee, and hot chocolate, and Bosco, and lemonade, and water, and alcoholic beverages [at LEAST some of them] and Kool-Aid, and milk, and if I left a beverage or drink out because I forgot or haven&#8217;t tried it I am sorry). I like some partys. I like to have fun. I sure would appreciate if these people would quit using beverages for their uniequivocal vocal confusion of our stances in the United States. I REALLY LIKE TEA. When I give a tea party, I don&#8217;t not wish for people to immediately think of this. I LIKE TEA.</p>
<p>IF in any way, the media, and this pseudomovement are indeed related to the events in Ausin, Texas &#8212; THEN this group must look in the mirror as inciting (let&#8217;s not confuse here) irreverent, dangerous behavior, forcing damage to our home soil, destruction of property, violation of numberous American values, and the taking of life in the name of being &#8220;patriotic&#8221; &#8212; if being patriotic causes this kind of behavior &#8212; sleep well and happy &#8212; may the tax-man find you for sure. This sort of behavior is costing a bundle. Frankly, I did not see the full speech that Sarah Palin made in Texas, and many seemed to enjoy it from what I saw. However, she has a gob of nerve coming to Texas and invoking the &#8220;S&#8221; word. She perhaps would have done better for her state of Alaska in actually serving her state for some major portion of her term. They elected her; I didn&#8217;t and she just plain let the voters of Alaska down.</p>
<p>Texas has enough to deal with on it&#8217;s own without carpetbagging imports coming to incite more to deal with and pay for before taxes. Shame on the Texas people who support this sort of outside intrusion. Texans never mind laughing at themselves. We don&#8217;t laugh at planes intentionally crashing anywhere in Texas. We DO have a degree of Howard Hughes in all of us by way of history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Masterful Performances Freshen a Familiar Tune by Gwendol Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2009/12/masterful-performances-freshen-a-familiar-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwendol Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1740#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I did get both versions of the CD &quot;Crazy Heart.&quot;  They both list as Original Motion Motion Picture Soundtrack. The regular version came in a hard plastic case.  It has no words to the songs, and a few pictures in a foldout sheet. The Deluxe contains 23 songs and the case is one of those cardboard ones and in no way labeled on the spine, front or back any way differently (other than the number 23 instead of 16). On the plastic shrink wrap, there is a sticker which shows it to be the Deluxe.

Both are good (of course).

I like each of them for different reasons. The movie version, is simply that, and I can remember the movie from that ats it plays.

The Deluxe has some other songs mixed in. There is a little booklet with the words to the songs in the movie, but not the extras. The notes for all of the songs seem to actually be readable without a magnifying glas. (That&#039;s a plus). For me, it is kind of like a juke box. I like that. Additionally, I also like Harry Chapin. In one of his songs the lady says she could sing like Kitty Wells. Now I get to hear Kitty Wells. Also ther are some other fine additions.

Jeff Bridges really did a fine job, and I also like the little entry of Robert Duvall.

So there you have it. I&#039;m not a music critic but feel I certainly got my money&#039;s worth with both, am glad I have both, and still aprreciate the fact you get in every now and again to toss out  something for our consideration.

We shall see in a few days if this movie wins some nice Academy Awards. I&#039;ll be watching!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did get both versions of the CD &#8220;Crazy Heart.&#8221;  They both list as Original Motion Motion Picture Soundtrack. The regular version came in a hard plastic case.  It has no words to the songs, and a few pictures in a foldout sheet. The Deluxe contains 23 songs and the case is one of those cardboard ones and in no way labeled on the spine, front or back any way differently (other than the number 23 instead of 16). On the plastic shrink wrap, there is a sticker which shows it to be the Deluxe.</p>
<p>Both are good (of course).</p>
<p>I like each of them for different reasons. The movie version, is simply that, and I can remember the movie from that ats it plays.</p>
<p>The Deluxe has some other songs mixed in. There is a little booklet with the words to the songs in the movie, but not the extras. The notes for all of the songs seem to actually be readable without a magnifying glas. (That&#8217;s a plus). For me, it is kind of like a juke box. I like that. Additionally, I also like Harry Chapin. In one of his songs the lady says she could sing like Kitty Wells. Now I get to hear Kitty Wells. Also ther are some other fine additions.</p>
<p>Jeff Bridges really did a fine job, and I also like the little entry of Robert Duvall.</p>
<p>So there you have it. I&#8217;m not a music critic but feel I certainly got my money&#8217;s worth with both, am glad I have both, and still aprreciate the fact you get in every now and again to toss out  something for our consideration.</p>
<p>We shall see in a few days if this movie wins some nice Academy Awards. I&#8217;ll be watching!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans Quietly Scramble for Stimulus Cash by David</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/02/republicans-quietly-scramble-for-stimulus-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1826#comment-249</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one thing to accept funding for your constituents that you do not believe they should have. It&#039;s quite another to publicly bash a program, vote against it, privately acknowledge that it&#039;s actually doing a great deal of good, and then run around your state or district handing out big &quot;Publishers Clearing House&quot; type checks and cutting ribbons for projects, giving the impression to your constituents that it was somehow due to your hard work as their elected official that has brought them the wonderful fruits of your efforts - when in truth, if you&#039;d had &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; way, there would be no check, and no project, and no new jobs, and no ribbon to cut.

If you&#039;re willing to bring the federal government to a halt, and stop all business from being conducted for &quot;principles that you cannot compromise,&quot; then you really should &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;have&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; those principles and the courage of your convictions. When you do it solely to deny your opponents any semblance of success, even when you believe that success would be good for the country, then you have neither.

There&#039;s a word for that. It escapes me at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one thing to accept funding for your constituents that you do not believe they should have. It&#8217;s quite another to publicly bash a program, vote against it, privately acknowledge that it&#8217;s actually doing a great deal of good, and then run around your state or district handing out big &#8220;Publishers Clearing House&#8221; type checks and cutting ribbons for projects, giving the impression to your constituents that it was somehow due to your hard work as their elected official that has brought them the wonderful fruits of your efforts &#8211; when in truth, if you&#8217;d had <em>your</em> way, there would be no check, and no project, and no new jobs, and no ribbon to cut.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re willing to bring the federal government to a halt, and stop all business from being conducted for &#8220;principles that you cannot compromise,&#8221; then you really should <em><strong>have</strong></em> those principles and the courage of your convictions. When you do it solely to deny your opponents any semblance of success, even when you believe that success would be good for the country, then you have neither.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a word for that. It escapes me at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans Quietly Scramble for Stimulus Cash by Gwendol Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/02/republicans-quietly-scramble-for-stimulus-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwendol Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1826#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Wellllll, , ,I FINALLY got around to reading both the rather lengthy The Washington Times article AND the Daily Kos article back-to-back. Either way, all things being equal, I figure (like debate) anyone voting on something in Washington is supposed to know both sides, up down, inside-out, and backwards. In theory, the individual should be able to debate either side equally well. When a side can not be debated, then it is a slam-dunk and cannot be debated fairly. One the one hand, it appears that the country has been bleeding jobs or positions within the work-force and the figures have been skewed there for a number of reasons simply by the tool which has been used.

It passed. Therefore, it is not a matter of &quot;scrambling&quot; -- those politicians are picking up what cards they already know are on the table to be picked up. Call it cards, ear-marks, tags, whatever. Were they for the bill or whatever? No. It passed. Are they supposed to then ignore it? Are they supposed to get what they can regrouped for their individual constituents? Well, that&#039;s what they are elected to represent. The rules of our game here in the United States are based upon The United States Constitution. The United States Constitution was drawn up and implemented prior to there being an internet. Our United States Constitution is a living document.

This all filters down to Federal rights vs. States Rights and Macro-Economics vs. Micro-Economics. &quot;Watch the pennies, and the dollars will take care of themselves.&quot; Well, to translate that to texting is a bit difficult now. Why? Sometimes the OLD ways work quicker and easier. I don&#039;t have a typewriter; I can immediately &quot;keyboard&quot; $ but I cannot back up and overstrike c with / in order to come up with the &quot;cents&quot; and a lot of those signs, &quot;good old underlying DOS&quot; (what operating system does that stand for?) won&#039;t allow for it in an emergency. There are work arounds, but let us face it -- any way you cut it, it is indeed a mess.

I refer you to Oscar Goodman, mayor of Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A. (do I add another period here?) PRECISION is required with underlying computer work. Am I that precise? No. Anyway, Oscar Goodman explains just why he is not running for Governor of Nevada, why he changed to embrace neither political party and states that he has 15 months left as mayor.  The question-answer period is *quite* interesting because he makes it clear why he has absolutely no interest in running for Federal Office requiring his physical presence in Washington, D.C. (which was SUPPOSED to remain a District, rather than a STATE). . .Oscar Goodman notes, regarding Washington D.C. -- that those people up there don&#039;t even LIKE each other. 

http://qik.com/video/4594145

It still comes down to the money. Where is it? Who has it? How can I get it? (Who, what, when, where, how -- how much -- all questions -- and the need for that period or WHOA.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wellllll, , ,I FINALLY got around to reading both the rather lengthy The Washington Times article AND the Daily Kos article back-to-back. Either way, all things being equal, I figure (like debate) anyone voting on something in Washington is supposed to know both sides, up down, inside-out, and backwards. In theory, the individual should be able to debate either side equally well. When a side can not be debated, then it is a slam-dunk and cannot be debated fairly. One the one hand, it appears that the country has been bleeding jobs or positions within the work-force and the figures have been skewed there for a number of reasons simply by the tool which has been used.</p>
<p>It passed. Therefore, it is not a matter of &#8220;scrambling&#8221; &#8212; those politicians are picking up what cards they already know are on the table to be picked up. Call it cards, ear-marks, tags, whatever. Were they for the bill or whatever? No. It passed. Are they supposed to then ignore it? Are they supposed to get what they can regrouped for their individual constituents? Well, that&#8217;s what they are elected to represent. The rules of our game here in the United States are based upon The United States Constitution. The United States Constitution was drawn up and implemented prior to there being an internet. Our United States Constitution is a living document.</p>
<p>This all filters down to Federal rights vs. States Rights and Macro-Economics vs. Micro-Economics. &#8220;Watch the pennies, and the dollars will take care of themselves.&#8221; Well, to translate that to texting is a bit difficult now. Why? Sometimes the OLD ways work quicker and easier. I don&#8217;t have a typewriter; I can immediately &#8220;keyboard&#8221; $ but I cannot back up and overstrike c with / in order to come up with the &#8220;cents&#8221; and a lot of those signs, &#8220;good old underlying DOS&#8221; (what operating system does that stand for?) won&#8217;t allow for it in an emergency. There are work arounds, but let us face it &#8212; any way you cut it, it is indeed a mess.</p>
<p>I refer you to Oscar Goodman, mayor of Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A. (do I add another period here?) PRECISION is required with underlying computer work. Am I that precise? No. Anyway, Oscar Goodman explains just why he is not running for Governor of Nevada, why he changed to embrace neither political party and states that he has 15 months left as mayor.  The question-answer period is *quite* interesting because he makes it clear why he has absolutely no interest in running for Federal Office requiring his physical presence in Washington, D.C. (which was SUPPOSED to remain a District, rather than a STATE). . .Oscar Goodman notes, regarding Washington D.C. &#8212; that those people up there don&#8217;t even LIKE each other. </p>
<p><a href="http://qik.com/video/4594145" rel="nofollow">http://qik.com/video/4594145</a></p>
<p>It still comes down to the money. Where is it? Who has it? How can I get it? (Who, what, when, where, how &#8212; how much &#8212; all questions &#8212; and the need for that period or WHOA.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans Quietly Scramble for Stimulus Cash by David</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/02/republicans-quietly-scramble-for-stimulus-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1826#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Hi Gwendol -

Jed Lewison wrote this piece for the &lt;em&gt;Daily Kos&lt;/em&gt;, a left-leaning mainstream political blog, where I read it. He was commenting on original reporting done by the right-leaning &lt;em&gt;Washington Times&lt;/em&gt;, a Washington Daily newspaper. They see themselves as a counterweight to the &lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;.

I had no hand in writing the article. The &quot;by David&quot; attribute only means that I am the one who posted it to &lt;em&gt;dmperkins.com&lt;/em&gt;. Anytime I post material from other sources or publications, I include a link to the original article or articles, and credit the writer, in this case, Jed Lewison.

The longer article in the &lt;em&gt;Washington Times&lt;/em&gt;, by Jim McElhatton, can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/09/stimulus-foes-see-value-in-seeking-cash/&quot;target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #0000ff;&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, as well as with the two links in the original post above.

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; I have changed the &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/2/9/835408/-Washington-Times:-GOP-lawmakers-privately-admit-stimulus-created-jobs&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #0000ff;&quot;&gt;Daily Kos&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; link in the original post so that it now leads to the reprinted story, as it should have in the first place. Sorry you had so much trouble finding it. My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gwendol -</p>
<p>Jed Lewison wrote this piece for the <em>Daily Kos</em>, a left-leaning mainstream political blog, where I read it. He was commenting on original reporting done by the right-leaning <em>Washington Times</em>, a Washington Daily newspaper. They see themselves as a counterweight to the <em>Washington Post</em>.</p>
<p>I had no hand in writing the article. The &#8220;by David&#8221; attribute only means that I am the one who posted it to <em>dmperkins.com</em>. Anytime I post material from other sources or publications, I include a link to the original article or articles, and credit the writer, in this case, Jed Lewison.</p>
<p>The longer article in the <em>Washington Times</em>, by Jim McElhatton, can be found <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/09/stimulus-foes-see-value-in-seeking-cash/"target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #0000ff;">HERE</span></a>, as well as with the two links in the original post above.</p>
<p><strong><em>UPDATE:</em></strong> I have changed the <em><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/2/9/835408/-Washington-Times:-GOP-lawmakers-privately-admit-stimulus-created-jobs" target="_blank"  rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Daily Kos</span></a></em> link in the original post so that it now leads to the reprinted story, as it should have in the first place. Sorry you had so much trouble finding it. My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans Quietly Scramble for Stimulus Cash by Gwendol Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/02/republicans-quietly-scramble-for-stimulus-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwendol Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1826#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I see that this you have tagged as by you, David. I had never heard of &quot;The Washington Times&quot; nor &quot;Daily Kos.&quot; Therefore, I first ended up on &quot;The Washington Times&quot; online edition. Oddly, there I found a link to (if I recall correctly) a www.slickrickperry.com site with what appeareed to be a cute game provided by K. B. Hutchinson (I THINK she might be a senator who decided to run for governor of Texas against that crunchy-haired Rick Perry governor [Texas A&amp;M -- used to be agricultural commisioner of Texas, I guess]) Well, that wasn&#039;t the article you have posted here.

So then, after much wandering around that &quot;Daily Kos&quot; link -- I spent some time listening to and watching the Senator Murtha videos first. Now THAT is really sad. He was only 77, went in for some sort of microscopic or laser surgery, they cut his intestines, I guess he got peritonitis and he died. They must have told the truth instead of trying to cover it up, but he is dead all the same. My husband admired some things greatly about him, although he did not agree with everything he said -- well, he loved me and didn&#039;t agree with everything I said, either. Anyway that is yet another subject; our flags ARE flying at half-mast -- most of them, anyway, I guess. (Regardless, those videos were recorded live, but of course, they no longer are...)

Well, I finally DID find that article that you have &quot;reprinted&quot; here.

However, what I am curious to know is if &quot;by David&quot; means that you posted it on your site, or what??? Or are you saying that Jed Lewison is a Ghost Writer, you wrote this article and he published it under your name?  Which brings us to the question I have asked before: &quot;Just who in the world writes the speeches for politicians???&quot; To me, these are good questions, all of this may have absolutely nothing to do with why you posted this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that this you have tagged as by you, David. I had never heard of &#8220;The Washington Times&#8221; nor &#8220;Daily Kos.&#8221; Therefore, I first ended up on &#8220;The Washington Times&#8221; online edition. Oddly, there I found a link to (if I recall correctly) a <a href="http://www.slickrickperry.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.slickrickperry.com</a> site with what appeareed to be a cute game provided by K. B. Hutchinson (I THINK she might be a senator who decided to run for governor of Texas against that crunchy-haired Rick Perry governor [Texas A&amp;M -- used to be agricultural commisioner of Texas, I guess]) Well, that wasn&#8217;t the article you have posted here.</p>
<p>So then, after much wandering around that &#8220;Daily Kos&#8221; link &#8212; I spent some time listening to and watching the Senator Murtha videos first. Now THAT is really sad. He was only 77, went in for some sort of microscopic or laser surgery, they cut his intestines, I guess he got peritonitis and he died. They must have told the truth instead of trying to cover it up, but he is dead all the same. My husband admired some things greatly about him, although he did not agree with everything he said &#8212; well, he loved me and didn&#8217;t agree with everything I said, either. Anyway that is yet another subject; our flags ARE flying at half-mast &#8212; most of them, anyway, I guess. (Regardless, those videos were recorded live, but of course, they no longer are&#8230;)</p>
<p>Well, I finally DID find that article that you have &#8220;reprinted&#8221; here.</p>
<p>However, what I am curious to know is if &#8220;by David&#8221; means that you posted it on your site, or what??? Or are you saying that Jed Lewison is a Ghost Writer, you wrote this article and he published it under your name?  Which brings us to the question I have asked before: &#8220;Just who in the world writes the speeches for politicians???&#8221; To me, these are good questions, all of this may have absolutely nothing to do with why you posted this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat, Dumb, and Not So Happy by Candy</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/01/fat-dumb-and-not-so-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1229#comment-243</guid>
		<description>I should try this diet...but gosh, Kent&#039;s diet sounds a lot more appealing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should try this diet&#8230;but gosh, Kent&#8217;s diet sounds a lot more appealing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat, Dumb, and Not So Happy by Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/01/fat-dumb-and-not-so-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1229#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working on something called the South Beached-Whale Diet.  

You just eat whatever you want, whenever you want, as much as you want, and quit exercising until you resemble a beached whale.  I&#039;m doing great on it; I&#039;ve put on a few extra pounds and I&#039;ve never been happier.  

My new favorite color?   Butter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on something called the South Beached-Whale Diet.  </p>
<p>You just eat whatever you want, whenever you want, as much as you want, and quit exercising until you resemble a beached whale.  I&#8217;m doing great on it; I&#8217;ve put on a few extra pounds and I&#8217;ve never been happier.  </p>
<p>My new favorite color?   Butter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat, Dumb, and Not So Happy by Pat Squires Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/01/fat-dumb-and-not-so-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Squires Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1229#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Wonderful to read, David. Very inspiring! Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful to read, David. Very inspiring! Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat, Dumb, and Not So Happy by Gwendol Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperkins.com/2010/01/fat-dumb-and-not-so-happy/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwendol Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmperkins.com/?p=1229#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Congratulations for tackling this age old difficulty. I am most curious to find how you are doing with it in a month or two. For what I have observed, this is to remain a fairly good way to correct an underlying potential for diabetes for some people.  There are choices, and I suppose that the occasional Beck&#039;s or Butterfinger will be okay, but I simply cannot imagine that you ever enjoyed those two at the same time. Food habits are different for lots of people. Kudos! I am glad that I don&#039;t have to send that warm fuzzy in order to improve your doctor&#039;s looks...you must have made his day. But just in case, warm fuzzy, warm fuzzy, warm fuzzy. I don&#039;t think that would really have done much for that butcher paper, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations for tackling this age old difficulty. I am most curious to find how you are doing with it in a month or two. For what I have observed, this is to remain a fairly good way to correct an underlying potential for diabetes for some people.  There are choices, and I suppose that the occasional Beck&#8217;s or Butterfinger will be okay, but I simply cannot imagine that you ever enjoyed those two at the same time. Food habits are different for lots of people. Kudos! I am glad that I don&#8217;t have to send that warm fuzzy in order to improve your doctor&#8217;s looks&#8230;you must have made his day. But just in case, warm fuzzy, warm fuzzy, warm fuzzy. I don&#8217;t think that would really have done much for that butcher paper, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
